The American Revolution was not only a war for independence—it was a prolonged test of whether self-government could survive crisis.

As fighting continued, American leaders confronted problems no battlefield victory could solve. The Continental Congress had no power to levy taxes and relied on state requisitions that were often delayed or incomplete. Continental currency depreciated sharply by 1779–1780. Supply shortages, enlistment instability, and interstate rivalries exposed the fragility of a confederation still learning how to function.

The Articles of Confederation, drafted in 1777 and ratified in 1781, formalized a union already under strain. Congress created executive departments for War, Finance, and Foreign Affairs, adapting administrative structures as necessity demanded. Robert Morris reorganized national credit. Military and civilian leaders negotiated authority carefully, reinforcing the principle that armed power remained subordinate to civil governance.

Local and state institutions also matured under pressure. Committees of Correspondence evolved into functioning political networks. State legislatures coordinated militia service and procurement. Public disagreement—sometimes sharp and highly visible—became part of a political process rather than a collapse of order.

Perhaps the clearest institutional statement came at the war’s end. In December 1783, George Washington resigned his commission before Congress in Annapolis, affirming civilian supremacy and rejecting personal power. The act signaled that the Revolution sought not military rule, but constitutional governance.

What emerged from the war was not a perfect system, but a working one—shaped by failure, negotiation, and adaptation. Independence required victory. Endurance required institutions.

The Revolution proved that liberty demanded structure, discipline, and shared responsibility long before the Constitution formalized those lessons.

Learn more about your patriot legacy here:
👉 https://sar.org …

The American Revolution depended not only on generals and soldiers, but on those who ensured that orders, intelligence, and trust moved efficiently behind the lines.

Tench Tilghman, born in 1744 in Talbot County, Maryland, began the war as an officer in the Maryland Line. By 1776, he joined General George Washington’s staff and soon became one of his most trusted aides-de-camp. In this role, Tilghman drafted correspondence, transmitted strategic orders, coordinated communications with Congress, and helped manage logistical and administrative details essential to sustaining the Continental Army.

In an era without rapid communication, this responsibility carried enormous weight. Dispatches traveled by horseback over rough roads. A delayed or misunderstood order could compromise troop movements or supply coordination. Washington relied on aides like Tilghman not only for accuracy, but for judgment and discretion. The position required political sensitivity as well as military precision.

Tilghman served through some of the war’s most demanding campaigns, maintaining communication between the army and civilian authorities during periods of financial crisis and shifting state support. His reliability earned Washington’s lasting confidence.

In October 1781, after the surrender of Lord Cornwallis at Yorktown, Washington selected Tilghman to carry the official dispatch announcing victory to Congress in Philadelphia. It was a mark of extraordinary trust. Congress later promoted him to lieutenant colonel and presented him with a ceremonial sword in recognition of his service.

The Revolution was sustained not only by battlefield courage, but by disciplined administration and trusted coordination. Tilghman’s legacy reminds us that leadership is often measured not by visibility, but by steadfast reliability in moments when institutions depend on precision.

👉 Learn more about your patriot legacy here:
https://sar.org …

One of the most difficult battles of the American Revolution was not fought against British troops—but against fragmentation within the American states.

The Continental Congress, operating first under wartime necessity and later under the Articles of Confederation (ratified in 1781), lacked the authority to levy taxes or compel state compliance. It could request troops, clothing, and supplies—but enforcement depended entirely on state cooperation. Each state prioritized its own defense, finances, and militia needs.

The consequences were immediate. During the winter at Valley Forge (1777–1778), supply shortages were not caused by total scarcity alone, but by breakdowns in transportation, contracting, and interstate coordination. Congress relied on requisitions, and states frequently fell short of assigned quotas. Soldiers often went unpaid for months. Uniforms and shoes were scarce. Washington repeatedly wrote to Congress warning that without reliable state support, the army could not endure.

Financial instability compounded the problem. Continental currency depreciated rapidly by 1779–1780, contributing to unrest among the ranks. In January 1781, the Pennsylvania Line Mutiny erupted over pay and enlistment terms, revealing how fragile civil–military trust had become.

Institutional reform followed necessity. In 1781, Robert Morris was appointed Superintendent of Finance and began restructuring national credit and procurement systems. Administrative reforms strengthened the War Department and improved centralized oversight—early steps toward more coordinated national governance.

The Revolution exposed a central dilemma: how could a confederation wage unified war without unified authority? The answer evolved slowly through hardship. The lessons of requisitions, shortages, and mutinies would later shape debates at the Constitutional Convention in 1787.

Independence required endurance. Endurance required coordination. And coordination required learning how to govern together.

👉 Learn more about your patriot legacy here:
https://sar.org …